Author: Martin Friel
Source: Insurance Age | 09 Jul 2010
Categories: Regulation
Tags: Networks | FSA | PPI | Regulation
The Financial Services Authority (FSA) has fined the director of a network for failing to properly supervise appointed representatives (AR) working on behalf of the firm.
David Head, director of Essex based mortgage and insurance broker network FT Compliance Services (FTCS), £10,500 for failing to properly supervise insurance brokers he knew had close links with a firm and individual previously disciplined by the regulator for payment protection insurance (PPI) failings.
FTCS operated as a network and recruited mortgage and insurance brokers as ARs. The FSA said that Mr Head was solely responsible for ensuring FTCS and its ARs were compliant but had failed to put in place systems and controls to ensure that the ARs made suitable recommendations.
The regulator found that Mr Head therefore exposed customers to the risk of purchasing unsuitable PPI.
While the number of sales in question was relatively small, the FSA’s investigation found that in cases where single premium PPI was sold:
• The ARs were not properly considering customers’ eligibility for PPI before making a recommendation;
• The ARs failed to consider whether any medical conditions or existing insurance cover made PPI unsuitable for a customer; and
• There was no evidence to suggest that customers were told that they could buy PPI from other providers which might be more suitable for their needs.
Margaret Cole, the FSA director of enforcement and financial crime said: “As a director of a network, Mr Head was personally responsible for ensuring that the ARs were properly supervised and he failed to do so. His failure is particularly disappointing given that he was on notice that two of the ARs had links with a person previously disciplined by the FSA for PPI failings.
“There is a serious responsibility attached to being an FSA approved person and Mr Head’s fine demonstrates that we will not tolerate failure to deliver on that responsibility.”
Recent comments
Most read
Most commented
Related articles
Interview
Andrew Tjaardstra speaks to Andrew Torrance, chief executive officer at Allianz and chairman of ClimateWise, about what the......
Quote of the week
Polly C
Since RSA began celebrating its 300th birthday, Polly has attended several of its soirees where its commemorative beer, brewed......
|
|
Register now to receive a FREE digital edition of Insurance Age or PB every month
Events
10 Sep 2010 , London
Services section
Register here for a FREE copy of PB (the strategic monthly management magazine for broker managers) or Insurance Age (the monthly magazine for the broking community).
Broker Expo is the annual event for the UK insurance industry, combining an exhibition showcasing almost 100 key companies with a programme of expert-led workshops to create the perfect business environment. Find out more.
Insurance Age's LinkedIn group, which now has almost 150 members, is aimed at anyone working as a general insurance broker as well as those serving the intermediary community including insurers, loss adjusters, claims management and IT providers.
The main profiles, brokingliz, brokinglou and probroking, which currently have just under 650 followers combined, feature a selection of the latest news, opinion, viewpoints, live discussion tweets and links to must-have articles from the world of the broking market.
Broking.co.uk is the only site dedicated to the UK broking community. To advertise your scheme, service or any upcoming events in this space to over 25,000 users viewing this page every month contact Chris Finnegan on 0207 316 9632.
Fines & Fees what does the Regulator do with them ?
I have read many times over of firms large and small receiving fines for breaching FSA rules. Can anyone tell me who the cheque is made payable to when the person / firm pays the fee. If it is made payable to the FSA, is the money 'ring-fenced' as 'Penalty Fines' or such like. And finally, who ever and wherever the money goes (to) what is it spent on ?
Rob
09 July 2010
Complain about this comment