Author: Martin Friel
Source: Insurance Age | 09 Mar 2010
Tags: Wales | Scotland | Government | Pet Insurance
All dog owners in England and Wales would have to insure against their pet attacking someone, under a consultation on amending the 1991 Dangerous Dogs Act
All dog owners in England and Wales would have to insure against their pet attacking someone, under a consultation on amending the 1991 Dangerous Dogs Act.
Police and local authorities could also be given powers to force owners of dangerous dogs to muzzle them or even get them neutered. The proposal is to introduce compulsory third-party insurance for dog owners to ensure attack victims are compensated.
Home Secretary Alan Johnson told the BBC he was concerned that some owners were keeping dogs with the sole purpose of intimidating other people.
The proposed insurance plan would not apply in Scotland. However, a backbench bill proposed by the SNP's Christine Grahame is currently being examined by the Scottish Parliament.
The Control of Dogs Bill would allow councils to impose restrictions on owners who failed to control their pets. The Dangerous Dogs Act, which was passed by Parliament in 1991 after a spate of attacks, brought in destruction orders for banned dogs in England and Wales.
In 1997, another parliamentary act amended the law, removing the compulsory destruction orders and giving courts discretion over the issue and the sentencing of owners.
However, a spokesperson for the Association of British Insurers said: “We don’t think it is a practical idea or one that will get much enthusiasm in the insurance industry. The proposal seeks to make compulsory a product that doesn’t exist.
"Third party liability exists in household or pet insurance but it does not cover dangerous dogs. There are four in the act but insurers will have their own lists. Third party standalone insurance will be prohibitively expensive. It is fair to say that some owners will not insure their dogs and how would you claim against an uninsured person?”
Recent comments
Most read
Most commented
Related articles
Interview
Andrew Tjaardstra meets Bill Cooper, managing director for insurance in the financial institutions division at Lloyds TSB......
Quote of the week
Polly C
Polly loves a divisive figure and, quite frankly, the insurance industry could do with more of them. There is no denying......
|
|
Register now to receive a FREE digital edition of Insurance Age or PB every month
Events
10 Sep 2010 , London
Services section
Register here for a FREE copy of PB (the strategic monthly management magazine for broker managers) or Insurance Age (the monthly magazine for the broking community).
Broker Expo is the annual event for the UK insurance industry, combining an exhibition showcasing almost 100 key companies with a programme of expert-led workshops to create the perfect business environment. Find out more.
Insurance Age's LinkedIn group, which now has almost 150 members, is aimed at anyone working as a general insurance broker as well as those serving the intermediary community including insurers, loss adjusters, claims management and IT providers.
The main profiles, brokingliz, brokinglou and probroking, which currently have just under 650 followers combined, feature a selection of the latest news, opinion, viewpoints, live discussion tweets and links to must-have articles from the world of the broking market.
Broking.co.uk is the only site dedicated to the UK broking community. To advertise your scheme, service or any upcoming events in this space to over 25,000 users viewing this page every month contact Chris Finnegan on 0207 316 9632.
Another labour tax con
This proposal is a revenue earner for the government.Try this example,conservative estimate of 10 million dogs in UK,average of 100 pounds insurance premium per animal per year,insurance premium tax at 5% (I think).This works out at 50 million pounds.This proposal is nothing more than a tax on dog ownership
Nick Hall
10 March 2010
Complain about this comment
test
test
test
11 March 2010
Complain about this comment